I agree with the well respected former DILG chief Alunan when he said that De Lima should have "recused' herself from the committee hearing on extrajudicial killing.
What is the meaning of "recused"? To recuse is to "excuse oneself from a case because of a possible conflict of interest or lack of impartiality".
De Lima obviously has conflict of interest because she is suspected of having links to drug lords; secondly; she is a harsh critic of the police so how can she be fair and impartial.
De Lima obviously has no "delicadeza"
If you noticed yesterday when she was interrogating of "Bato", her tone of voice and facial expression appeared to very hostile and defensive. She also spent quite a lot of time explaining her actions as Justice Secretary instead of asking question to explore information that could help them in the aid of legislation.
De Lima used the hearing to justify whatever she did or did not do as Justice Secretary to the public.
Below is Mr. Raffy Alunans comments.
De5 is conflicted. She has no business chairing the committee hearings on drugs where she herself is suspected to have links to drug lords. She should have recused herself.
As chair, she tried to stop Senator Zubiri who had not yet consumed his 5 mins, and didn't give Sen Cayetano his 10 mins when another Senator yielded his 5 mins to him.
She's gagging those who do not conform to her twisted narrative of the war on drugs.
That speaks volumes.
What is the meaning of "recused"? To recuse is to "excuse oneself from a case because of a possible conflict of interest or lack of impartiality".
De Lima obviously has conflict of interest because she is suspected of having links to drug lords; secondly; she is a harsh critic of the police so how can she be fair and impartial.
De Lima obviously has no "delicadeza"
If you noticed yesterday when she was interrogating of "Bato", her tone of voice and facial expression appeared to very hostile and defensive. She also spent quite a lot of time explaining her actions as Justice Secretary instead of asking question to explore information that could help them in the aid of legislation.
De Lima used the hearing to justify whatever she did or did not do as Justice Secretary to the public.
Below is Mr. Raffy Alunans comments.
De5 is conflicted. She has no business chairing the committee hearings on drugs where she herself is suspected to have links to drug lords. She should have recused herself.
As chair, she tried to stop Senator Zubiri who had not yet consumed his 5 mins, and didn't give Sen Cayetano his 10 mins when another Senator yielded his 5 mins to him.
She's gagging those who do not conform to her twisted narrative of the war on drugs.
That speaks volumes.
Rafael Alunan: De Lima obviously has no "delicadeza"
Reviewed by Tsismiso
on
7:32:00 PM
Rating: